I strongly prefer to see who's talking at the event higher at the top of the page, as I'd tend to close the page after hitting a video I probably won't watch.

I chose A because the page was shorter and I didnt view the added partners section as an enough of a draw since the page already has more then enough information for me to decide to sign up

Unless I am missing something, these two links appear to be identical aside from some slight formatting differences, instinctively I feel option is better as the 'about the summit' section appears sooner while scrolling down.

I go with Choice A because I'm more compelled by the list of panelists and speakers than I am by the video of the two graphic artists. The video looks inviting to me as a non-graphic-designer because it highlights the 'newbie' accessibility. However, I imagine a designer would prefer the professionalism of the panel wall.

I like being able to see all the speakers up front and at the top. Makes me more likely to be interested and grab my attention right off the bat.

I chose option A because I like seeing the pictures of the speakers first before the video.

A has the better layout. The registration prompt is way more commanding and grabs my attention. It has a bold and confident presentation.

This one seems more organized and easy to follow

Subtle differences but i prefer option A, the header prior to the video makes the page flow better with logic

I prefer option A. It seems to be warmer and friendlier.

I think that option A is easier to read and is less busy.

Shorter URLs are better.

Option A is better, the video coming after the list of people speaking in the submit looks more organized. It's okay!

This option has the guests higher up. A person in this field would know these names and thus be enticed by their presence, they don't need the introductory video.

I prefer the layout in option A, and I feel like or as if most of my questions were answered in the FAQ sheet on the bottom of the page. I think the only thing you could do is be more specific about what each perosn will talk about?

Yes I feel that it is pretty thorough. I might also want to know what presentations there were going to be and when.What is the start time and finding accommodations.

I picked A because it shows more of the details first. For me personally, I would scroll and look through it all for the information I wanted. I don't think there's anything wrong with B just A is my preference.

I prefer the option A print design registration page layout design because I like how the presenters are shown before the video description as seen in the option B layout design.

I prefer to see the look who's talking first, that to me is the main seller of the event so the higher up on the page the better. If I saw the video higher up in Option B it's a chance I'd stop scrolling and assume the don't have the name of who's talking or either whoever is talking might not be that good.

B's design I feel is able to flow a lot better and thus is able to look better as well.

I feel all my questions were answered including the dates of the event and the speakers for the online event.

Yes, my questions about the event are answered and I liked that B featured a bolder color scheme.

I think having the video closer to the top is better because there's good information in there.

you begin to lose my interest when I see all the people and what they are talking about- move your registration up and the listing down, unless they are someone who will draw people in on name alone.

I chose this option because I prefer seeing the details before getting to the section to register.

It looks better with the YouTube video

I prefer B, I like the introduction with the creators of the event, it makes the event feel more personable.

I like Option B's layout the most out of the two. I think there are certain aspects of layout 2 that I like more than the other. Specifically the hear from the pros section. I thought that was a good addition to the layout. In terms of questions, I think the page did a good job of giving a clear message about the event and what to expect.

I chose B because I think it has the more cohesive layout, it makes the most sense.

They don't really look very different to me but I like them I think they work well with the topic I think they could use more of a background design since it is a design Summit. I do like the list of speakers I do wish there were a little bit more information about each of them or that you could click on them to learn more maybe take it to their website. Is it just me or did it not say where the conference is?

Option B feels more engaging. The smiling faces make a differenceOther than that, they are not too different.

The introduction on this page is better formatted.

B.. This one with the video it makes it More relatable and personal and down to Earth. It was Great!

I liked how option B had the video. The video helps people get excited, especially for people like me who might not have had an interest otherwise. I also think the video helps this feel more personable, like I know the presenters already, not just looking at their names on a list with their headshot.

This option gets to the "Look Who's Talking" section a little sooner, which for me would be an important part of the the event.

This design is good and a lot of my questions I had about the site and the company was answered on the page in a simple and easy manner. The site runs smooth with both options and the layout is good.

I like option b I think option b is more easy to navigate.It looks better from a viewer standpoint. It looks more inviting it has a better look at the people included and you get a better idea of the event. I'd like the images that are focused on the front page more in this option. I like the inviting atmosphere that you can feel from this page better than option A.

B has some normal looking people (attendees?) close to the top of the page, whereas A launches straight to the speakers. I like the normal people in B.

I think it separates layout sections better by having the video between the two boxy sections. Good contrast, good differences among law of similarity.

I like that it has the intro video near the top of the page.

I feel that all of my questions would be answered in option B.

They're both really good but this one stood out a little more with the video near the top.

The added photos and video near the top of the page makes the webpage more appealing.

I will choose option B' because the layout for the registration looks appealing and the heading goes straight to the point making it simple to read.

I would wonder what type of events went on within this festival.

Having the guest list be below the video of the founders and etc. talking about the event and what it's about in general just seems more natural.

I prefer this format with the video closer to the top of the page on this website. The colorful video embedded on this page would intrigue me to learn more about this event rather than just skimming over it and missing out on important information.

I like the second one, the video is higher up.

Option B has the best registration page because it looks easy to complete and explains everything that I will get after signing up.

I'm choosing Option B because I like the video. It's a good video but I'm a poor listener, I'm a text guy. I learn best by reading and in my opinion those "3 Reasons To Join Us" are critical to capture people like me. In my opinion they need to moved up because I arrived at your page in real life I likely wouldn't watch that video (I watched it now only because you are paying me to do a good job)...but those 3 items I wouldn't miss: Learn new skills. Grow your income. Get inspired.I think moving those three up where they are more likely to be seen would capture the attention of people like me and hopefully do so long enough and in a way that gets people to sign up for the free summit. Best wishes with your summit!