I like how A has the products in large image as well as the background color so A

This one is very straight forward and shows the product in a strong way, I can see the quality and detail very clearly.

MORE DYNAMIC AND PLEASING TO THE EYE

I prefer option A as it looks more professional.

I liked the simplicity of choice A since it grabs my interest. Choice B looks too complicated and doesn't do much to grab my interest.

so....the other one shows the picture that doesn't include the actual pour spout. although i like the black background it also takes MUCH longer to load. that may just be because i'm on a bit slower connection but its not that slow, i loaded them at the same time and i can imagine that it likely loads slower on a cell phone too.

I think B is way too busy with the key image. A is satisfactory and says more with its text.

A was far more professional, engaging, welcoming, and intriguing.

I prefer Option A because I can clearly see what the purpose for the product is above the fold without the need to scroll down as opposed to Option B in which I would have to scroll down the page to get more clarity on how the product is being utilized.

I liked that this option featured testimonials that had empowering statements about why these pourers are the best. B felt a bit barebones.

A is the best one for me because I do have some like this at home and they work very well and do not leak if you place right. I would buy this one and more than several to give as gifts.

B was dark, depressing, sad, and boring. A was bright, bold, and intriguing.

I like Option A here more, because immediately upon going to the site I see what they're selling and what it's intended use is. Option B is fine as well, but I had to scroll down a bit to figure out what the actual product is which to me is a negative.

This describes what the product does more.

I picked A as my top choice as the layout of the store makes i very easy to look at.

I think option A is the easiest to understand which makes me want it more

The link is short and memorable. Loads quickly.

The other website didn't load correctly.

I strongly prefer the more simple webpage layout design here, the image on the other looks better but I actually prefer the more traditional webpage and it takes a lot less time to load.

A much more modern look with a more exciting photo.

This looks more refined and feels like more effort put into it.

I think the webpage looks better in option B more than option A. It looks more authentic and better overall.

I selected the homepage design that I found to be the most visually stimulating and captivating.

option b looks more professional and modern

Option B seems much more in line with modern web design versus option A so it is more enticing.

I like the video integration on B, and A looks like it was designed for free by a middle schooler

I like the homepage design in option B better. The design looks higher quality and more modern. It would make me more interested in purchasing the product.

B is the more attractive looking website. It also looks way higher quality than A.

B has a better appearance to me. I was interested in the overall design it had.

I think that it was very cool that choice B had a proposition that their product never leaked. I think it addresses a big problem in this type of industry.

I like the one that has the girl in it. the other one looks boring.

more intuitive website and more dynamic than the other option

I like the homepage design in option B more because it looks more modern and feels more polished. Option A looks very outdated and uninspiring.

You can see the different packs and different prices

I thought option B looked more interesting with the photo chosen for the homepage.

Love seeing the product in actual use!

The main image makes the site and product more inviting. It is more personable while the other one is more business.

This website seems much more interactive and intelligent. Sliding drop downs and images, GIFs, star rated testimonials. Very attractive website in comparison to the other.

I strongly prefer option B. I really like the professional and dynamic look of the webpage. Option A seems a little bland and boring so I wouldn't be inclined to purchase the product. I love how B includes a lot of videos that really show the product in action; that makes me want to buy the product because I can truly see it working in a variety of different applications.

I like B because when you see actual bartenders using the product is makes for a more attractive product.

B looks a lot more professional. When I clicked on A, I thought it looked quite cheap.

The homepage design is personable and attractive. The quality is on a par.

I'm going to be very simplistic and say that B's webpage looked better and would probably make me want to buy something from there more so that's why I selected it.

I chose B because it showed you how to use them.

Definitely B. This website looks like it was created by a professional. Not a part timer who does this as a side gig. Much better graphics, web page setup and presentation. The other one looks amateurish.

When designing a website you want to ensure you are portraying the use or service of what you are selling immediately. The graphics should be crisp, clean, and no fuzz (pixals). The homepage should have all the key details the customer needs to know since most people don't visit the other pages unless interested. With the use of testimonials, pictures, videos and key featured items you gain the customers attention. You never want the customer to have to guess what they are looking at.

I voted for B because I felt that it is much more interactive and makes me feel like I am using the product. I also felt like I was really interacting with the product with the pictures and slides.

A way more unique, modern and stylish design in my honest opinion

I felt the design looked a lot cleaner than the other option. Only thing is, the larger carousel images needed to be fixed - they looked a little out of focus on my computer.

Option B, the changing images at the front of the page are beautifully photographed, whereas you have a relatively ugly, static main image in Option A.