Option B is very boring.

I like all of the detail here and it just makes it interesting to me.

Even though i usually like a more sweet and simple description i think A was much more informative and would get me to read the book

I chose option A because I think the description captures the potential reader's imagination more, which makes me want to read the book. Option B is just okay. It doesn't make me excited to read the story and the description is a little bland.

This is more in depth without being too wordy

I liked this description more because it sounds exciting right from the first sentence. It's more descriptive and dramatic, which I liked.

stands out a lot more , more detailed , more persuasive and quick in catching my interest

B just lays out a summary, A catches my attention.

A is intriguing!

both are worded nicely, however I believe A would make me more interested in reading further.

This one sounds more interesting than the other one.

A is more engaging to reader and makes me want to read more

This one is the better looking and makes more sense.

Option A sounds much more interesting than option B. Option B to me doesn't sound very descriptive and is a little all over the place. Option A makes you want to jump straight in and start reading and is one of those books you wouldn't want to put down.

This one was less busy up front. The other one was listing names left and right which is hard to follow.

i like it very much

A is much clearer and easier to follow. B has too many perspectives crammed into too small of a space, and is confusing.

Staring out with technology had me interested from the start since I enjoy reading about technology.

Option A is an easier introduction. It is easier to follow and the first paragraph is a much better way to introduce the story. Option B feels like it rambles on. So not sure if all readers will be able to catch onto that.

The passage in this option starts off more riveting than the other option.

Option B gets you hooked quickly and doesn't seem as wordy as A.

Option B is definitely a more appealing book description and actually something I would like to read.

i like this one it is and easier read

I think it sounds interesting. I like the idea of dealing with death in virtual reality

The first sentence should pull you in to want to read more... the "technology had changed..." did not keep me motivated to read more but when I read "Mike had died three times..." I was instantly wanting to know more and kept reading.

Really pulls you in and gets you excited right away

A is less concise and is more confusing. B definitely has more impact

I chose B because A started off with a description that I wouldn't want to read further. B was much more descriptive and engaging and I wanted to find out what happened to everyone.

Short and direct, to the point. People don't want to read a long-winded item. Shorter is better and grabs your attention.

Option B just captures my attention better and makes me want to keep reading.

I liked option B more because it immediately attaches you to the characters and who they might be. That draw on character details is important in grasping a readers attention.

I'm immediately grabbed by the first line. How many people can say they've died three times?

honestly the opening paragraph of B was better overall - it invoked visions that made me want to read more and see where it was going. A was a little wordy and on the dull side

the first sentence of this one is more exciting, and encourages you to keep reading

I'm not reading the whole deal for four cents, but A is unoriginal and borign. B at least isn't

I prefer the introductory paragraph and how it familiarizes you with the character.

I feel this description sounds more appealing because it introduces the characters immediately and it's informative, as well as intriguing, without giving too much of the story away.

The first line catches your attention right away.

shorter and easier to read

This one sounds more personal of a description.

This is the least cliched answer. (Also, I would do another punctuation and grammar check before you post it.)

I prefer this option because it leads off each paragraph with a person's name. That makes it more personal and engaging.

FIND B MORE INTERESTING AND IT CATCHES MY ATTENTION

The first sentence sucks you right in. "Died three times..." How does someone die three times! Great lead in.

I like the wording of this. The first sentence just draws you in.

Talking about dying caught my attention right away and made me want to read more.

I am very interested in story B. I sometimes feel like Mike and Maria.

This one sounds very interesting, but the other one sounds like it describes the situation more clearly. This sounds very interesting and would make a great book and film adaptation.

It is must read as iterated by this caption. This makes me want to book within the day

Option B adds compelling elements right off the bat that draw you in. You keep reading to find anymore little details, and the description leaves you wanting more making it a perfect description. Option A reads almost like a history book, and it's lengthy descriptions make you almost lazy while reading. It lack a sort of "wow factor" needed to make a reader interested.