I like the blending of science used in this blurb toward the end with stories of trauma healings makes for a good narrative

The phrasing feels less clunky in A than B. The sentences flow together better.

A is the far better description. The words and sentences here flow much more naturally. I also think that how the premise is described is more naturally engaging with the way it is written in A.

I chose A because it's more well-written and more persuasive than B.

this has a more engaging and interesting hook followed by a more interesting storyboard and conclusion

I'm gonna go with description "A" because it sounds - ever so slightly - more scientific and less "wooo"..that is, less mystic and new agey and incredulous.

This one sounds very intriguing and makes me wonder how the story will progress. The verbiage used piques my curiosity.

Option A seems a little bit more informative in summarizing the story without giving the story away.

Neither seem to be all that interesting. I was lost at the spiritual teachers and healers, etc. Just not something that I would be interested in.

While extremely similar, I prefer A simply because B's statement-of-fact that trauma can be erased in minutes is too far-fetched for me to believe. If one's memory is wiped or an alter personality comes through, sure. But in ordinary circumstances? Nah.

I prefer A, the description generates more interest and curiosity in me to learn about the doctor.

I would rather buy this option because it emphasizes the transformative journey of the author, highlighting human connection and spiritual growth, and the focus on new strategies for healing feels more hopeful and profound. The integration of neuroscience and trauma healing in a more expansive way appeals to broader sense of personal and medical transformation.

I like option A the best because the text is more descriptive and makes it would like the book would provide a fresh and updated look that will teach me how to shape my life.

there's no real difference between the paragraphs, so you can pick any. the purchase intention is identical

Slightly prefer the way A was written, parts of B were confusing, such as the "and can be erased in minutes" part of the last paragraph.

The story is engaging, and the author's passion shines through.

Option A semed easier to read and was written in a more "relaxed" style that made me more interesting in reading.

I like the wording in option A a little better, it feels a bit more direct and to the point.

I like this one since it has more action feel to it when I read it. It feels like when reading this outloud, that it blends together more and when read outloud, this one has more emotion and puts me more into the story which I love

a.. I leaned towards this one because of one thing because I think they're both really great. But with the last paragraph first sentence it uses the word "our" so it makes it more down to Earth and relatable for people.

I would vote option A, because of it being slightly different in its wording and the grammar used, is what draws me in more into the book's description and would make me more likely to choose Option A over option B.

I chose this option because it is well-written and compelling.

Option A is the book description that sounds more thorough and complete. I like how the story description is phrased, it sounds interesting and like there is a lot of depth to it. I am curious and very intrigued by the option A book description and it is the one that I am more likely to buy

I think overall these are both good and similiar but I like the way the words are used better in choice A. It feels more natural and easier to read and understand the character and emotion.

Option A is written with much more descriptive language and eloquence. I think it is more intriguing and draws my interest in reading this much more than the other option.

"When Innovative solutions...fail" makes it seem less related to him than the alternative in A. I do like that B mentions the New Zealand award.

These are so similar it's difficult to choose. A evokes a somewhat more emotional response after reading it, so I'm giving a slight tilt towards A.

A flows better. It's more compelling. It transitions from one sentence and thought to the next seamlessly

Both of these are really good this one seems to convey more of a sense of urgency and I think I just generally like it better it's a little more enthralling read

I like a. A little better flow on the wording but still leaves much out to make you want to know more

This option highlights all the key point of the why would by the product and that description is awesome.

I think it is always better to keep it less wordy. The shorter the better for a description.

I arbitrarily picked B because these are both overly wordy and bland; neither of them makes me want to read the book.

I believe this version of the text is better at establishing the character's current motivations and making them more relatable.

I would choose Option B because it highlights personal growth, leadership lessons, and the power to change both people and organizations, making it feel more inspiring and impactful.

I feel like the description is much more indepth and speaks to me more personally.

This seems more concise and less wordy than A. It economizes words and keeps my attention as not being too verbose.

After carefully studying and comparing both book descriptions listed above, I selected Option B over Option A as my first preference and the one that I would more likely click on to learn more about this book. I felt that this option was less "wordy" and to the point and the sentences flowed better.

B is definitely more interesting and makes me want to read more. The writing is well done and intriguing.

I prefer the book description in Option B. Option A offers no different information, but is just slightly more wordy. The book description in Option B is enough to pique my curiosity and I want to learn more about this man's story. The second paragraph is very captivating and exciting and I want to know more about the new science that showed him new healing and miracles. I'm curious how a man of science and engineering made the transition to the potential of magical or unexplained miracle healing. I think a clearer, more concise book description is better than the longer one in Option A that does not offer any additional information to account for its length.

Option B - The description of the book is very simple and accelerates the readers' interest to explore the book in its entirety.

This sounded more proper to me in terms of english language. The segment was a bit wordy though (both were)

I feel like B is a little more down-to-earth and relatable than A. The word choice and structure feel warmer to me.

This option felt slightly more descriptive in a way that evoked emotion and curiosity from myself as the reader on how the story progresses.

The description in B makes me want to immediately start reading the book

B sounds a lot more engaging to me and would be something that sounds a lot more like an exciting read.

I would choose option B' over the other because it sounds very interesting to read with clear understanding.

Sounds a little clearer to understand

The wording is more concise and succinct in this outline. The word he is used too often though and could be replaced.

It seems to summarize things very well and get to the point to understand the book basis.