Save to favorites
Add this poll to your saved list for easy reference.
Option C won this Ranked poll with a final tally of 27 votes after 1 round of vote counting.
In a Ranked poll, respondents rank every option in order of preference. For example, when you test 6 options, each respondent orders their choices from first to sixth place.
PickFu requires a majority to win a Ranked poll. A majority winner differs from a plurality winner. A majority winner earns over 50% of the votes, whereas a plurality winner earns the most votes, regardless of winning percentage.
If an option does not earn a majority of votes, PickFu eliminates the option with the lowest number of votes. The votes from the eliminated option are reassigned based on each respondent’s next choice. This process continues in rounds until a majority winner emerges.
Scores reflect the percentage of total votes an option receives during the vote counting and indicate the relative preference of the respondents. If there is no majority winner, look to the scores to see how the options fared relative to one another.
Option | Round 1 |
---|---|
C | 54% 27 votes |
A | 30% 15 votes |
B | 16% 8 votes |
Both Option A and Option C's quote is memorable and catchy as it is simple and direct. Option B had a bit too much compound in its sentence therefore not making it as catchy or memorable.
Option A seems more attractive to me. I like the wording for this one better then the others
I like the message in option A the best as it uses the word "grow" which sounds appealing for this service.
A and C are both fine to me but B contains a typo and makes no sense.
Options A and C are a bit more compelling than Option B, which contains incorrect grammar and makes me think the company is not very professional.
Are you sure Option B does not have a typo? It doesn't make sense. Either A or C is good.
I feel every single one of them is simple into the point. While they are all worded a little differently they are all easy to understand
Option B has some sort of error or typo, so this is my least preferred choice here.
I like how fast and easy it is to read A. C is also nice but it doesn’t read as fast. B has too many words and I don’t like it.
Choices A and C are the top two for me because I like how both of them keep it simple with you the short phrase, comma, phrase setup. I like how they both keep the wording short, to a minimum and to the point. Choice A is first for me over Choice C because the idea of being able to grow something appealed to me more as opposed to just building wealth. Plus, investments make me feel like I would be a bit more involved in it. Choice B is last because it was a bit too long for me, I did not like the unnecessary being in their and it repeats the word money twice in three words.
I like option A. I think that it will appeal to many and is straight to the meaning of the message.
I like A and C they are short and to the point.
Grow your investments tax free is a big deal for many so choice A is a good fit for this website
I think option A gives the best direct line as to what they do. I wasn't sure if B was a typo or just a play on words.
A definitely seems more approachable and appealing especially for first time investors.
The words used int the naming statement fits well for tax legal reason and justifies its action.
I like option B because I feel like it explains the purpose of the website very well. I also like how it says I can avoid unnecessary taxes which is something I would love to know.
Phrases that more captured money growth and less taxes were more appealing to me.
I ranked B first because it gets right to the point.
Choice B is most appealing here, for one simple reason. It tells you that it avoids UNNECESSARY taxes, the issue with A and C is that they leave that out and it leaves it open to interpretation if anything shady could be going on that could bite you later. This one, being a lot clearer, is much more appealing. When it comes to taxes, you can't be too careful. That said, I think B has a grammatical error that should be fixed: "Money your money grow", should probably be 'watch your money grow'.
I like B, it is really descriptive on how it will work.
Option B makes the product sound like you're staying legal, while only paying what you have to for taxes while still seeing an increase in money.
Option B looks best as it explains what they are trying to achieve without making it look like they are trying to avoid the taxes or play with the tax system. Looks a bit more legit. Other statements even though they are fine too would seem a bit fishy as if you are trying to evade the taxes.
This is the most appealing because it is the most simple and straight to the point. Everyone wants to be wealthy and they want that wealth to continue to grow. Tax-free is also a great benefit so I like that it is easy to see that
Option C is definitely the one I find the most appealing.
To me option C is simple and straightforward and tells you everything to want to learn more in 4 words.
C and A are Catchy. B has a typo and is too wordy.
Wealth sounds the best. Most people don't have investments, and keeping it simple is always smart.
B is too wordy. C is brief and catchy!
Build wealth, tax-free is a nice simple and attractive wording
I chose C in first place as it is a catchy slogan for the website's theme.I chose A in second place as it has statement related to the theme of the website.I chose B in third place as it seems to have some grammatical error.
I thought the first two choices were straightforward and easiest to understand.
My first choice has "wealth' in it, I think that's fairly eye-catching and would draw me in. My second choice is okay, but just doesn't pop as much. The third choice is too wordy (and actually looks like it has a mistake in it, "money your money grow.")
I prefer C. Short and to the point and who wouldn't be interested?
I like a focus on wealth and a message that's short and sweet
I like C because it is simple, then A because it sounds positive and B last because it seems like it has a typo.
C is the most straightforward and concise and people would understand what it means quickly, or have a good idea.
Keep it short and sweet! WEALTH and TAX-FREE will generate immediate attention.
I prefer the short and to-the-point texts. My top 2 choices are easy for everyone to understand, which is nice.
I like option C/A. It's easy to understand (growing your money). Option B makes no sense.
C is concise, clear, and demonstrates exactly what you'll do for me. A is also concise, but I like the way C sounds better. B is wrong grammatically. "and money your money grow" isn't correct. Besides that, it is too wordy. Keep it simple.
I prefer the option C headline because I want to build wealth tax free and this headline short, easy to understand and easy to remember. I chose option A second because this headline sounds similar because it talks about growing your investments in a tax free way but is longer and less memorable. I chose option B last because this headline text does not make much sense and is very long and not easy to remember and the money our money grow phrase should probably be rewritten to the more understandable phrase of make your money grow.
This one is the best and gets my attention.
Simple is best. "B" doesn't make sense.
the last one doesn't make sense. the first two aren't bad. is this building wealth from already existing wealth? everybody wants to build wealth, especially tax free.
This one is more positive to me. This is what I want, to build wealth.
I prefer options C and A over option B because they are more concise and direct than option B. I like option C the best because I think that "building wealth" is more interesting and appealing than "grow your investments".
First off, option B is nonsensical. Build wealth is my first option as it infers you are making money tax free.
Option C is a clear and complete description of the services offered by the company without stating what kind of activities are offered or discussed as a part of that service. This leave the door open to possibilities, which I really like in a company of this type. Option A is close, but narrows the services to investing, so that if the company offers services that are unrelated to investing, it would be misleading. Option B is grammatically incorrect.
The third choice doesn't make any sense grammatically. The other two are equally good in my opinion, but my top choice is simply because it has fewer characters, and would be easier to fit into print ads in a larger font.
Explore who answered your poll
Analyze your results with demographic reports.