Tweet A is more concise, to the point, and has a more encouraging call to action.

I prefer option A looks clean. I find it easy on the eyes.

I'm interested in the stories they have to tell.

meh, both seem a little uptight and preachy but this one less so

I think Option A is better. It is quicker to the point and quicker to read. Perfect formula for a tweet.

It's shorter and to the point. Brevity is preferred on twitter, even on a tweet thread.

I prefer Option A because it is more straightforward and direct in the message.

I would click on this one first because it is much more simple and to the point. It tells me exactly what it will be about without making me read too much or making it too confusing

A is more engaging because it gets to the point and doesn't have a lot of distracting filler.

A is nice, concise and easier to get. If I'm interested I will click. B is just too much up front.

This tweet is written in an easier to understand way.

The simplified text is easier to read and gives more insight into their story

A is shorter and more eye-catching. I'm more likely to read it and click on it because I won't be turned off by too much writing to read.

I like that it's more straight to the point which is what I expect from twitter.

The use of caps lock in Option B feels ostentatious and like it has more style than substance. Option A captures my attention because it is more straight-forward and subtle, and I would assume it is more intellectual.

A because of less reading. No one wants to read a long tweet

The tweet in option A is more appealing. The concise and more active language catches my attention better.

Be brief, like A. Leave people wanting more - like famous comics and performers always say. B is just a bit too much. You just want to "grab" people - which you DO in a.

A is less wordy, more to the point and drew me in.

I chose choice A because choice B uses too many caps and made me feel anxious like i was being yelled at.

I like how to the point option A is, it summarizes what the point of the article is in as few words as possible.

I like that this is short and to the point. It has the right amount of info to make me curious and want to learn more.

simple and easy to understand without looking like a long winded paid for advertisement.

I prefer option A because this tweet is easier to comprehend and understand, process, it looks more inviting and intriguing unlike option B that seems a bit jumbled and dsicouraging.

In above the content is based on the twitter quotes. I choose the option A in the first position because this option content is easy to read it. Also understand easily.

Option A is better and makes more sense. This is easier to read and more direct. I would go with that as the better quote. Feels less manufactured.

It's much shorter. I lost attention on the second one my the time I got to the end of it.

This is a clearer and more efficient message that I find more attractive.

Honestly, a lesson, quote, or fact would make me want to read the rest of them, if that makes sense. Definitely prefer A though

I would be more likely to click on option A to read the rest of the thread because I think that it is a more concise, interesting, and attention-grabbing tweet.

I think option A is much better written, option B uses the word distill too much, and seems too much like a LinkedIn post.

Option A gets right to the point. Option B is fine, but option A gets right to the meat of the message.

I prefer the option A tweet because the text length is much shorter but still very descriptive, and the option A tweet uses much simpler words and directs me to click on it to read the rest of the thread because of the ellipsis used at the end of the tweet that is at the end of the shorter more direct last line.

much more succinct and easy to read and follow - this is the better choice to click on for more

this is more to the point and succinct

The tweet is easy to read and understand. It really peaks my curiosity to learn more.

this is easier to read and follow when it's more simple and not wordy

Choice A seems more concise and interesting to read

Option B is too wordy. makes me feel like the person is trying too hard and complaining that they didn't have time

A is much simpler and thus more appealing to me.

The description in B offers more of what i would get out of reading the thread, which is why i think it more likely it would entice me to click more.

I feel more motivated with the tweet from option B more than option A.

This option is worded better and makes me curious as to what else they have to say.

I prefer B because I think it makes the thread seem more interesting and useful.

I like B better as it seems more thought out and the bolded words really attract my attention.

I feel it is more thought out. It has a better explanation.

This is more well-rounded, and sums it up, but leaves the reader "wanting more." I would click on both, but I would click on B first. This was a very tough choice though, as both look incredibly compelling.

It's a little more forceful. But it is a little fake because of the capital letters.

I prefer Option B because he sounds more intelligent, interesting and well-spoken.

The other feels a bit too much like click bait, giving no substance just a tease. While the other is also baiting a click, it at least gives some idea of what it is without spoiling a longer thread.