It's catchier

Option A flows better and sounds more of a real story not fictional.

sounds more interesting

Option A lets you know what the book is about more.

It just sounds better....

It just seems to grab better, you know exactly what you are getting

I like the time reference

I like the idea of an adventure around the world. It makes me want to read about that.

I like that the title is simple.

i like the play in the title

I like the allusion to the work "Around the World in 80 Days."

Option B just doesn't make a great deal of sense.

I think choice A is a catchier title.

A is much easier to understand.

It sounds like your living vicariously through the author

sounds more interesting

Because it makes more sense, to travel around the world in 50 years.

It flows better than option B, the pause in the title is in the middle as opposed to the beginning.

The phrase "Around the World" is a familiar phrase and feels comfortable and inviting.

Flows better.

I like title B a lot, actually. I might have chosen it, but because A has the reference to "Around the World in 80 Days," it flows off the tongue and is easy to remember. "To Every Last Land" is a little hard to say.

Option A. Much more appealing title for sure.

B sounds a bit awkward.

reminds me of the book around the world in 40 days

Option A just seemed to flow better than option B. Option A also sounds like it's an actual story while Option B seems like it would be a fantasy book.

Around the world tells the possible reader the book is about travel immediately which would likely attract more readers in this genre.

It sounds more interesting.

This one seems to flow off the tongue easier.

flows better

I like A much better, B sounds kind of weird

Option A flows much better than Option B.

A better reference

more interesting

Its catchier

The first book option familiar and it feels simpler than the second.

Option A is a play on a classic Verne story making it more appealing.

The title is more memorable.

It sounds so much better.

Seems more to the point

I'm 50 years old and this just "grabbed" me!

It sounds smoother and is more readable.

seems to be the best

Option A flows better

It's a less wordy title and the first part is more descriptive.

Choice A makes it states you have visited every country first hand. Choice B makes it seem like your journey is over.

It reminds me of Around the World In 80 Days and I really like that book.

the second choice seems a little clunky

I like the way it's stated in option A more.

flows better

I don't like the phrase 'to every last land'

Sounds better

sounds interesting and will not cause confusion about what to expect for content

It's more intriguing and would make me want to pick the book up to read more about it.

title is more catchy

it reads "smoother" and more interestingly.

The "To Every Last Land" phrase is awkward and doesn't really relate to the overall context of the title, I believe. "Around the World in 50 Years" is a concept that people can instantly understand and connect with.

It sounded more dramatic/interesting.

The title sounds more catching and less common.

I like the sound of worlds instead of lands, it's more appealing to me

Option A sounds very straight forward, I think that's a good title for the book. Option B sounds a little passive.

seems more interesting

It sounds more interesting.

The title seems more professional and no so run on.

It sounds more exciting and less information filled, but more experience filled.

sounds more compelling

This is the better of the two, but both are a little "tired" and cliched.

i would buy (A) after reading that

I think the "50 year" part is better earlier in the title

choice A uses a phrase i've heard of, "around the world in ___ days/years/etc," while choice B sounds like it's trying too hard to sound fancy

It gives a more clearer explanation of how long it took to visit every country on earth. Also that it was an adventure to visit each place with sounds like it was an interesting and pleasurable thing.

The first few words already capture my attention. The topic was about traveling within 50 years.

It is more appealing.

It's more interesting.

Sounds more adventurous

Around the world sounds like a much nicer trip around the globe. To every last land makes it sound like an "end of the world" type set up.

It just rolls off the tongue better. It begins with an open vowel, so reciting it causes the mouth to open and relax and puts you in a whimsical state of mind.

flows

very similiar probably because the beginning in option A gets straight to the point where it says ''Around the world in 50 years'' more appealing to me but both are good though either one is suitable

It's much more compelling and interesting. I actually want to read that book now.

I easily identified the literary allusion (Around the World in 80 Days), and therefore the title seemed almost to put the book into a literary tradition that I enjoy. I also liked the use of the word "world" instead of "land"--the latter seemed diminutive in some way, whereas the former encapsulated the idea of the entire planet.

The title flows better and pays homage to 'Around the World in 80 Days'.

I think the title is more simple, and straight to the point. I think Option B is a little bit lengthy, and Option A flows a bit more.

The 'Around the world in 50 years' gets my attention immediately.

Option A is easier to comprehend and sounds like a fascinating journey. It catches my attention and makes me want to read the book.

It sounds catchy (because of the allusion to the title "around the world in 80 days).

This is much more captivating to me. I can understand it very clearly as well and feel i know what the book is about. However, when i look at choice b, I get caught up on 'to every last land' and am not captivated.

reminds me of the book with a similar name

It drew me in right away, sounds much more interesting than the other option.

The other title doesn't sound right when you say it out loud. A is a lot more catchy.

Rolls off the tongue better. Better flow.

Around the world in 50 years sounds like around the world in 80 days

Easier to understand

I honestly don't like the phrasing of "To every last land". It kind of makes me not want to read the rest.

It sounds more interesting

The other one doesn't sound natural.

It reads more smoothly

Around the World sounds more adventurous and catching.

Sounds more fluid

I like the play on words in relation to the Verne classic. And I don't care for the use of 'every' twice in the second one.

simple and straight forward title

The other title is confusing. This sounds like a real adventure

just sounds better to me

Sounds more natural.

the title is a better attention grabber

Very direct on what the book will be about. Choice B seems to be worded strangely

Choice A sounds better.

The title flows more smoothly off of my tongue.

It sounds more interesting.

It sounds better.

I think it might be the format that pulls me in since it's kind of a known format "Around the world in XX XXXX", but it definitely flows off the tongue easier and is easier to remember.

Title is more descriptive. Title B leaves the actual book summary to the subtitle.

Even though option A sounds boring, it's hard for me to grasp what option B means. I would most likely scan over it and not even comprehend what it's trying to say. English is my first language.

Around the world rolls off the tongue better than To every last land.

Option A has better wording and seems more intriguing than option B. Option B's title does not flow as well.

I like the reference to classic literature!

It sounds better than B.

"Around the World" is the go-to phrase to use.

It just sounds more intelligent.

To Every Last Land bugs me grammatically.

I like the reference. I think it sounds less melodramatic, and more genuine and interesting. The first one sounds like there's going to be some boring-ass theme clouding up the experience

A is more simple, B is too wordy.

I think it does a better job of describing what the book is about in fewer words. I understand what it means to go around the world immediately. To every last land could also reference a specific geographic area.

It's just a catchier title and somehow sounds a little less narcissistic (no offense) :)

Title clearly states what the book is about.

Less wordy and confusing

sounds better

A plays on the around the world in 80 days and is less wordy

It's catchier because of the play on words.

The title makes perfect sense and makes me interested in buying the book to learn more, whereas B is a very confusing title.

seems to come off easier.

The title of the first one, "Around the World in ...." is just more appealing.

It seems like it would be more adventurous and not as boring.

it seems more like a book title than choice b

It sounds better when I mouthed the words.

seems more interesting

Option B is somewhat awkward. Option A is much better.

Easier on the ears

SOUNDS MORE INTERESTING

It reminded me of Around the World in 80 Days. The familiarity of it makes me like it more.

Option B has the word "every" in it twice, and I just prefer the sound of Option A overall.

Title A flows better and ultimately sounds less forced than title B.

"Around the World in 50 Years" has a much better flow than "To Every Last Land" for me when browsing book titles. It would take a slight bit longer to process option B's meaning, which might make me lose interest quicker.

Choice B's title is very exciting. It invokes a broader range of emotion than Option A, which seems a little stale and academic.

Around The World phrase has been used a lot

This title makes it more interesting.

Very interesting and fun title

I like Option B because it emphasizes the idea of visiting every country in the world.

To every last land is sounds catchier than Around the world.

It is more attention grabbing for me.

I prefer Option B.

More original

I think this title is more unique, and I like the word "land."

Less cliche than the other answer

This title makes the book more interesting. It sounds like the author will explore apocalyptic.

This was written more clearly than option A. I am able to clearly understand what this title is actually about.

I like the wording.

Seems more enticing and less boring

Exudes adventuresome vibe

I think this one sounds more interesting to me.

This title is catchier.

Option B sounds more like the author has a set goal to accomplish, which I find interesting. Option A just seems more of a chronological journal of his travels, which although may peak some interest to certain readers, I don't feel the title captures a bigger range of audience.

It is not as cliched as the Around the world.

Option B sounds more interesting than Option A.

Option A sounds too boring and unexciting. "To Every Last Land" makes me more interested and more likely to read the book.

Having 50 years later in the description sounds more exciting.

I like "to every last land" and I think the way choice B is written makes more sense.

More interesting

This title seems more personal and interactive.

more unique name

Choice B has more succinct grammar. It seems to flow better in thought.

Option B by a small margin. I really like both titles, A is just a bit more cliche, but I still think it might be as good or even better due to familiarity. Tough call if looking for mass appeal.

I like it better. It's more unique.

It doesn't sound like a Jules Verne rip-off

around the world in 50 years sounds too much like around the world in 50 days, i prefer a more unique title.

Starting phrase is very attractive.

It sounds more worldly to me. It makes it sound like the person has an experience to share with me that I may enjoy reading about.

Option A is just too clichéd for my tastes, option B sounds more interesting and new. I'd want to read something by someone who titles their work without relying on hackneyed tropes.

Around the World in 50 Years sounded a little corny.... The other option is a little more original.

Choice B seemed more unique (considering Around the World in 80 days is already a title). A unique title indicates to me that the book is unique as well.

"Around the world in" has been done over and over. The first title sounds more exciting, and not the same ole story we've already heard.

The name sounds more fluid and natural.

The title sounds more adventurous.

This choice feels more romantic and even though they both have adventure in the title, title A feels much more likely to live up to it.

It's slightly more creative and attention grabbing

I feel like it's less generic and cliche. Option A "Around the World in 50 Years" is easy to write off as being boring. I think with such an accomplishment it should feel anything but boring.

The other is too similar to verne's around the world in 80 days, people who aren't paying close attention may mistake it for a book they've already read

The title is more interesting and creative to me.

less cliched

Doesn't sound as trite.

This one sounds less cliche'd.

"Every Last" sounds more conclusive

Sounds more interesting to me

"Around the World" is often used. Very cliche. I like the other title because it's different and caught my attention.

I think ita a more solid title

Sounds less like a rip off.

Choice B is more novel, while choice A is similar to previous publicaitons

Sounds more interesting.

The start of the other title is too common.

I feel more intrigued by the voyage worded in this manner.

It seems more interesting and grabbing