Sounds more grandiose than option B

Sounds better

I don't really understand what option B is supposed to mean.

How I lived to 196 seems absurb

To every last land makes it seem like a really incredible journey. I honestly don't understand the other title.

the title is catchy

Option B sounds confusing and Option A actually sounds interesting and more clear on what the book is about.

sounds more interesting

I just think it rolls off the tongue better with only one number in the title.

I really don't like either title. But if i have to choose, then How I live to 196 is lamer than To every last land

How I lived to 196 is an incredibly stupid title for a book that's presumably non-fiction.

Both parts of the Option A title are focused on the travel. The title in Option B is split between two different subjects, leading to questions about what the book is mainly about.

Sounds a lot better

I liked A better because B reminded me of one million other titles. A is different than most.

best

The B title does not make sense to me (196?), option A is better and more direct.

I don't like the phrase "How I l Lived to 196".

B's title is more misleading and A's title makes more sense

sounds more appealing

It sounds more interesting to me

Option B sounds too sensational, I like A better, it's concise and simple but still intriguing

It sounds more appealing. It's kind of catchy, rolls off the tongue a lot easier.

I cannot comprehend what "how I lived to 196" means; therefore, the other title is the best choice for me.

OPTION A is intriguing. OPTION B is slightly confusing; the title makes it seemed like the author lived to be 196...

Option A seems less fictional and the title is less ridiculous.

Option A sounds more natural

Every last land sounds more epic, plus 196 makes it sound like his age.

I prefer Option A because it sounds more accurate, eloquent, and descriptive. Option B is misleading at first when it says "How I lived to 196." People might think it's 196 years. It just doesn't feel as appropriate to describe the book.

I prefer Option A.

Sounds thrilling.

B is a bit unbelievable, nobody lives to be 196, I don't think it sounds very credible

I think that the title is much more creative and makes me more interested. I like that it describes how long the adventure took.

Option A sounds better and more relevant

B title sounds too fictional so I like A better.

sounds more mysterious

That title sounds better to me and living to 196 doesn't make much sense.

I can't explain it... it just sounds better

(A) does not sound preposterous

Seeing every country sounds like an adventure that I can dream about. Living to 196 sounds like bull.

Option B makes no sense.

Because the other title makes little to no sense.

sounds compelling and realistic

I like the whimsy of the title, makes it sound more like an epic quest

A is best, but neither is really good.

It is more interesting

sounds believeable

The second title turned me off to reading the book at all

Other title almost sounds like the person is 196 yrs old.

Sounds more realistic

I like it better. To every last land sounds more exciting to me.

The title sounds much more realistic and interesting to read. I would want to find out what it has to offer.

Sounds more natural than option B.

Seems more realistic

more appealing and less typical

Option B doesn't make any sense to me.

How I lived to 196 is really confusing to most people. I know what that means but I doubt the average person does. I would rather you just named it MY 50 YEAR ADVENTURE TO EVERY COUNTRY ON EARTH.

I think the title is catchier on this one

The title to option B sound unrealistic. There is no way the author live to age 196 and then wrote about it.

The other option sounded pretty typical and bland. The first option, "To Every Last Land" sounded more lyrical, adventurous and interesting.

"To every last land" is more appealing to me

I would love to see every country in the world. I dont think its possible to live to 196.

Much more concise and less numbers, FTW.

The title sounds a bit more relevant.

Option A is my choice, it really tells a story and I'd be curious to read this book.

Option B is too fantastic, and not in the positive sense of the word.

I understand A.

Sounds ambitious

It sounds better, like an adventure. "How I Lived to 196" sounds like the beginning of one of those terrible "Acai super berry secret that they don't want you to know about" ads that tries to sell the latest crap fad.

Option B seems not to be credible.

How I lived to 196 sounds like a joke. It's not possible to live that long. I like To Every Last Land - it sounds like the story of an adventurer, an explorer. Sounds exciting.

The title is simple and informative.

It sounds more interesting.

I find the first title more plausible and and easier

I think that that title is more interesting to me. It gives more of a mystery than the other title. I am not sure that most people would want to read an article or book title how to live to 196 years old.

Sounds interesting

other one doesnt make sense

Sounds interesting and the other sounds fake and made up.

The first option is much more poetic. Also, I'm not quite sure I understand the meaning of the second title.

the first one sounds like it's an old age memoir , the latter a travel explorer's tales

Option A is better on the way the title is written. Option B makes me think the person lived to 196 years old with the way it is written.

Sounds less far fetched and more mysterious

I don't imagine a person living til 196.

Option A sounds more intriguing and makes me want to read it more.

It is catchy and makes me want to read it, the other title is to confusing

This sounds like an interesting travelogue. Also I don't understand title B. How does one live to 196? So title A is better.

option B is confusing me. Did the person live to be 196? no, surely not.

They are both pretty good actually. I do think to every last land is catchier though.

I chose option A because Option B was horrible. Just a title implying that someone has lived to 196 is a turn off -- you think it is some sort of a scam.

The words flow better in this title

I chose option A because the title of the book is interesting.

living to 196 seems far fetched

I like letter A because it appeals that there are exciting moments in every country for the 50 years.

How I lived to 193 is such a random age that it is hard to make sense of it.

The title for A had made more sense than the one B had.

Option A is better than B. B makes me think of a self-help book.

more catchy, not sure why other option mentions "196"

sounds more interesting, no one lives to 196 as the other option may indicate

The title makes more sense in my opinion.

The other one doesn't make sense...This one makes what the book is about more clear.

The title says she went around the world

The first title does not make sense to me. No one lives to 196?!

sounds a lot cooler

I don't think adding the age 196 is needed for the title its a bit confusing, I like A better.

Title B is not believable - no one can live until 196.

makes more sense

I was turned off by Option B's "How I Lived to 196" immediately. "To Every Last Land" appeals to my very strong desire to see as many places on this planet as possible. It's visionary and exciting.

sounds better

Option A sounds more realistic. No one lives to 196. The title of A is also more interesting.

I can't believe that someone lives to 196!

Choice A is clearer . Choice B tries to say two different things

I chose option A because the adventures to every country could be a last stand before getting too old and dying.

Don't understand how living to 196 correlates to traveling for 50 years.

Sounds better

Option B's title is irrelevant and unreal.

I just like the way A sounds better.

It seems like the better title. The beginning of B seems a little odious.

It sounds like an adventure, and more relevant than the age issue.

Option B doesn't sound like it's a book that's really about how this person lived to be 196.

How I lived to 196 is confusing in Option B. Most people don't know that there are 196 countries. The alliteration in Option A works better.

Rolls off the tongue better.

I would read that, sounds adventurous

This title seems more interesting to me.

I am intrigued by the 196.

I just like this one better

B sounds far more intriguing.

Measuring life by something other than years is cute.

196 is long time to live - how was this accomplished?

Option B sounds more exciting.

This explains more of what a big topic of the person's life was. Living 196 years!

The option makes more logical sense and is not confusing

The prefix sounds more interesting

Pulled in by living to 196

more intriguing

better

the title is more straight forward telling me what its about exactly

It makes me curious because I do not know anyone that has lived that long. I want to read more.

title is more interesting sounding - every last land seems clunky

Very intriguing.

eye catching

Living to 196 really caught my eye. It is more interesting.

The title B is more intriguing. What exactly 196 stands for ?

The title makes me curious to read more

better

It is eye-catching to see a book where people can live more than double the highest expected current ages are, to 196 that is. I love the word adventure in both titles though!

This title seems more catchy

more descriptive

For some reason option B sounds better to me than option A since it provides more information up front maybe

interesting

Both titles are a bit verbose, but I think B sounds a bit better.

It sound better. It's more fluid.

more appealing

sounds interesting.

Seems to give more of a description.

Everyone would be tempted to read this book to find out how someone lived to 196

The '196' interests me...

It attracts more curiosity "lived to 196".

Option B's title is catchier and pricked my sense of whimsy.

I'd want to know what's meant by living to 196 because obviously the author isn't literally 200 years old!

Contextualizes better. I am now curious about the 196 years.

Neither one is very good.

The title sounds better when you say it out loud.

Really intriguing title. Would definitely pick this book up

It's outrageous, which catches my attention. I'd be more likely to notice and remeber this title.

I think the living to 196 that starts off the title catches attention and people are going to want to know more about what the book is about.

More intriguing

I like the fact that they claim to live to 196.

I would want ot know how they lived to a fake age.

I like option B because the title "How I Lived to 196" is intriguing. I am curious to know what the author means, did he or she have an especially long life (okay, obviously not to 196!). Or, rather, did he or she have so many experiences in such a short time that it seemed like many lifetimes, and if so, I want to know what those experiences were. It makes me want to to learn more.

Both titles are a little too long, but option B catches my attention and interests me more than option A.

it's much more clever and intriguing.

Choice be is more curious

This option is a little more attention-getting

Living to 196 sounds very interesting. I would definitely be interested in reading that book.

I feel like using "How I Live to 196" really helps set the tone. It's a good way to get people to look at the book, and is a lot better than "To Every Last Land", which I feel like doesn't connect a reader quick enough.

It has two interesting components: a long lifetime and the adventure.

I would be interested in learning about the living to 196 part.

Showing the age of 196 caught my eye

No one has lived that long as far as we know.. be interesting to see what they're talking about.

The wording is less confusing in option B, and makes me want to discover how I can live to be that old.

Sounds better.

The title sounds more appropriate for a book. It seems more interesting for me to pick up and read.

Option b gives the sense of doing the impossible. Nobody has lived to be 196 years old yet.

Listing the number of countries sounds more interesting.

More eye catching

better sounding

Catches my eye better. How I Lived to 196 stand out much better than To Every Last Land.

It is more catchy

Choice b is more explanatory, and every is only used once

Title B offends my sensibility and sounds braggadocios, yet I would pick title B over title A, which sounds acquainted. Although Title B is a bit more clear in understanding.

It sounds better. It sounds like a book I would want to read.

The title "How I lived to 196" is intriguing and makes me want to know what he means

The title sounded more interesting

I like option b but would suggest changing 196 to something that rhymes better with the second half, if possible.

It seems more intriguing. I looked at the title and thought, "Wow living to 196? Even Okinawans can't do that." Then I read the rest of the title and figured it was a metaphor. Either way, it captured my attention.

Seems to promise some personal benefit to me, vs. just someone's travel diary.

makes more sense to me. more intriguing

The '196' made it sound more epic.

the other option is a little confusing

I think Option B is much more intriguing and interesting. I would see Option B and be very likely to pick it up to peruse just based on the title alone. It draws someone in right away with the first sentence and you would want to know more about it. I would choose Option B if naming this book.

It says a little more about what the book is about in the title. Looking at option A, it could be about numerous things.