A is more descriptive. offers more at a glance than B does

Sounds more descriptive even though they both say the same thing.

The first item in the description is the basic description of the item. This is vital, as it is most efficient when searching listings to find items you want first, then narrow down by details (brand, fabric, etc).Though note in A that "Little Tinkers World" is mentioned twice, which is redundant.Option B is actually more brief and to the point; it would have been preferred over A if the item was listed before the brand.

I like this one, a little more info.

I prefer option A because it starts off with the product which is a hooded baby towel and then describes where the lion design is from so it gives the customer a clear description of the item and what it is about.

I would prefer Option A. Option B begins with "Little Tinkers World" and customers usually expect the product name to be first, not the company name, unless it is well known. Also, for Option A, I would only mention the company name once, not twice.

i prefer this one

The comma looks much better to me. The other ones does not seem like it fits.

Having the product mentioned before the name brand is a better marketing description because it will caught the eye of the customers looking for this item sooner.

A is a bit more descriptive about the product and its kinda catchy

I chose A because you can tell what the product is by the first three words. It is longer but I knew what it was instantly.

This Title describes more and gives more information.

This title sounds more appealing.

I think the wording of Choice A flows better. It starts off saying what the product is (hooded baby towel). In Option B, you don't exactly know what you're getting until you read the whole thing - and even then it seems like one big run-on sentence.

I prefer the title that lets me know what the product is up front, leading with the 'hooded baby towel' portion. I don't need to know who it's by, at least not initially.

i THINK A SOUNDS A LITTLE BETTER. IT JUST SEEMS A LITTLE SIMPLER.

I want to know what it is, so I would go with the product first instead of the brand name

I prefer A because it lists the name/type of the product first, which is more important than the brand.

I like the slightly more detailed version on A.

I like the product name first, not company name, not sure Little Tinkers World needs to be 2 times in the sentence but I still prefer to have the item first.

Ii like that these tells us it is a lion design. Who makes it and who it is for.

Shorter and more concise. Easier to understand.

I don't typically like pipes in names, but the other name was way too long.

B is shorter and more precise about the baby towel

Option B because it is easier to read, i.e. the text is broken up in a more organized manner that makes it easier for me to read and process right away.

It is short. It makes shared sense. It is succinct.

more simple and to the point

Option B is very simply stated and I like the | dividers between items. It is clear cut and easy to tell what product you are getting. Option A is a little hard to read straight through, it feels like a long run-on sentence and feels kludgy.

Its much shorter and more concise.

It has a better sound to it.

sounds more professional

It gives the brand FIRST so that the description makes more sense. Option A feels too open ended and the description isn't as clear or clean cut.

I don't really like the | I must admit, because I find it to be very clickbaity and seems to just be there to generate attention rather than providing anything meaningful. With that being said, it's better than the other because the other is way too long as repetitive with the maker of little tinkers world repeated twice

I think this doesn't repeat as much as the other and only uses Tinkers once.

This one sounds more appealing.

I chose this option because the other seems very repetitive in its use of Little Tinkers World

not as repetitive sounding, easier to digest and read and decide quickly whether you want to buy it or not

Option A is too wordy. We know it's from Little Tinkers World, so the second time it's mentioned is redundant. Option B is perfect, but the line that separates "Little Tinkers World" and "Hooded Baby Towel..." should be either longer or a different color. When I first read it, I thought it was a capital "I" This sounds cute and my new nephew would love it.

I chose option B because I felt that the information was more accessible in that format. It also was easier for me to see and understand. I also liked having the brand right in the beginning for me to see.

I think the product name should be the first thing in the wording. If someone like the product and the way it is made and they would like to buy another product from the same company, the company name needs to be remembered. That is why it needs to be first so that people remember it

More concise and to the point

It is clearer and more compact.

I think it is more direct

Brevity is better, and B is still wordy but better than A

B because it sounds catchier with the little tinkers world in the forefront.

Sounds pretty good, and I would buy it

I like how it separate with the bar the brand and then the description of the product. In fact the other one is too wordy because it states the brand name twice.

The other title has redundant terms. That causes it to be longer than it has to be.

More clear and to the point. The other one is way too wordy.

Short and sweet is best, its simple and to the point while still having all important information in the title!