|
B1.
|
The layout is nicer and I like the comments from users to be right there for easy access instead of scrolling down.
|
|
B2.
|
looks more informative
|
|
B3.
|
I like the bullet point reasons - quicker, easier to read then the listed out format
|
|
B4.
|
Option B gives upfront reasons why their search engine is better to use. It is easier to follow than option A, and the reasons are easily laid out.
|
|
B5.
|
It's more informative.
|
|
B6.
|
It feels a lot less cluttered and more structured.
|
|
B7.
|
easier to read
|
|
B8.
|
B is more informative and has more links that take to other useful sites!
|
|
B9.
|
Option B looks less wordy. It is all in a small area so I feel I can read what it's about quickly. Looks neater than A also.
|
|
B10.
|
I like that it compares it to Google, but it needs a better design/layout
|
|
B11.
|
i like option B
|
|
B12.
|
Option B had a cleaner look to it than Option A. It also appeared to be easier to navigate without "filler" content.
|
|
B13.
|
good
|
|
B14.
|
My choice is B because I found it easy to read. The information was placed in a organized way.
|
|
B15.
|
good .i like it
|
|
B16.
|
good
|
|
B17.
|
looks cleaner, more stremlined
|
|
B18.
|
it caught more navigation so my choice is B
|
|
B19.
|
good
|
|
B20.
|
I like the second site because the home is precise with all available options
|
|
B21.
|
It lists out the features which are the options realiable than Google and not available in Google. A doesn't list any.
|
|
B22.
|
I selected this page because it has a very friendly interface, which gives ease of use. Results are very quick and specially the caption box is a smart option.
|
|
B23.
|
set up better with the links
|
|
B24.
|
It seems to be simpler than Option A
|
|
B25.
|
Option A seems like it is just attacking google. Option B gives you the bullet points up front with the ability to look farther into it.
|
|
B26.
|
I can find and read the relevant information quicker.
|
|
B27.
|
B is good and best answer.
|
|
B28.
|
I liked Option B because the relevant information about the site's features were dispalyed without having to scroll down the page.
|
|
B29.
|
I like that you did not have to scroll very much to read the information.
|
|
B30.
|
more presetable looking
|
|
B31.
|
i like it
|
|
B32.
|
looks more organized.
|
|
B33.
|
Something about the zero click info made me not want to read on in option A. It was almost too distracting.
|
|
B34.
|
Much more concise, clearer, easier to understand
|
|
B35.
|
Option B has a better design
|
|
B36.
|
The web page was much more concise and easy to read and respond to. Easier to navigate.
|
|
B37.
|
Easier to read and understand at a glance
|
|
B38.
|
The layout is cleaner, more organized and thus more attractive and professional. I would rather click on a hyperlink and obtain more information than to see that information on the very same page. Not only is that type of design neater and require less scrolling, but it also allows for more information to generally be provided. and so, that's why I find Option B more attractive and informative.
|
|
B39.
|
I prefer option B, as because it has more features than option A.
|
|
B40.
|
The second page appears more concise and professional.
|
|
B41.
|
Results are well organize
|
|
B42.
|
It was easy on the eyes and inviting visually.
|
|
B43.
|
Option B makes me want to use the search engine more because it more clearly provides things to click on for more information.
|
|
B44.
|
i have choosed option "A" because the brief explaination is listed for every points in that page.
|
|
B45.
|
Looks like more info
|
|
B46.
|
It seemed to flow easier, which made it easier for me to soak up the info the page is trying to display
|
|
B47.
|
makes more ineresting poins
|
|
B48.
|
Option B just looks more organized.
|
|
B49.
|
Option B clearly states how About Duck Duck is different than GOOGLE !
|
|
B50.
|
Which About page makes you want to use this search engine more?
|
|
B51.
|
well both of them are almoet same,so it doesn't matter.
|
|
B52.
|
Easier to read
|