|
B1.
|
The layout is cleaner, more organized and thus more attractive and professional. I would rather click on a hyperlink and obtain more information than to see that information on the very same page. Not only is that type of design neater and require less scrolling, but it also allows for more information to generally be provided. and so, that's why I find Option B more attractive and informative.
|
|
B2.
|
I like the second site because the home is precise with all available options
|
|
B3.
|
good
|
|
B4.
|
it caught more navigation so my choice is B
|
|
B5.
|
looks cleaner, more stremlined
|
|
B6.
|
good
|
|
B7.
|
good .i like it
|
|
B8.
|
good
|
|
B9.
|
Option B had a cleaner look to it than Option A. It also appeared to be easier to navigate without "filler" content.
|
|
B10.
|
easier to read
|
|
B11.
|
It feels a lot less cluttered and more structured.
|
|
B12.
|
Option B gives upfront reasons why their search engine is better to use. It is easier to follow than option A, and the reasons are easily laid out.
|
|
B13.
|
I like the bullet point reasons - quicker, easier to read then the listed out format
|
|
B14.
|
looks more informative
|
|
B15.
|
The layout is nicer and I like the comments from users to be right there for easy access instead of scrolling down.
|
|
B16.
|
It's more informative.
|
|
B17.
|
B is more informative and has more links that take to other useful sites!
|
|
B18.
|
Option B looks less wordy. It is all in a small area so I feel I can read what it's about quickly. Looks neater than A also.
|
|
B19.
|
I like that it compares it to Google, but it needs a better design/layout
|
|
B20.
|
i like option B
|
|
B21.
|
My choice is B because I found it easy to read. The information was placed in a organized way.
|
|
B22.
|
It lists out the features which are the options realiable than Google and not available in Google. A doesn't list any.
|
|
B23.
|
I selected this page because it has a very friendly interface, which gives ease of use. Results are very quick and specially the caption box is a smart option.
|
|
B24.
|
I can find and read the relevant information quicker.
|
|
B25.
|
more presetable looking
|
|
B26.
|
Something about the zero click info made me not want to read on in option A. It was almost too distracting.
|
|
B27.
|
The web page was much more concise and easy to read and respond to. Easier to navigate.
|
|
B28.
|
set up better with the links
|
|
B29.
|
I prefer option B, as because it has more features than option A.
|
|
B30.
|
The second page appears more concise and professional.
|
|
B31.
|
Results are well organize
|
|
B32.
|
It was easy on the eyes and inviting visually.
|
|
B33.
|
Option B makes me want to use the search engine more because it more clearly provides things to click on for more information.
|
|
B34.
|
i have choosed option "A" because the brief explaination is listed for every points in that page.
|
|
B35.
|
It seemed to flow easier, which made it easier for me to soak up the info the page is trying to display
|
|
B36.
|
makes more ineresting poins
|
|
B37.
|
Option B clearly states how About Duck Duck is different than GOOGLE !
|
|
B38.
|
well both of them are almoet same,so it doesn't matter.
|
|
B39.
|
Easier to read
|
|
B40.
|
Which About page makes you want to use this search engine more?
|
|
B41.
|
Option B just looks more organized.
|
|
B42.
|
Looks like more info
|
|
B43.
|
Easier to read and understand at a glance
|
|
B44.
|
Option B has a better design
|
|
B45.
|
Much more concise, clearer, easier to understand
|
|
B46.
|
looks more organized.
|
|
B47.
|
i like it
|
|
B48.
|
I like that you did not have to scroll very much to read the information.
|
|
B49.
|
I liked Option B because the relevant information about the site's features were dispalyed without having to scroll down the page.
|
|
B50.
|
B is good and best answer.
|
|
B51.
|
Option A seems like it is just attacking google. Option B gives you the bullet points up front with the ability to look farther into it.
|
|
B52.
|
It seems to be simpler than Option A
|